Raul Silva

Male, Age 58 Waterford , Connecticut

Raul Silva is a 58 years old male, born on Monday, 20th of April 1964. He will turn 59 on April 20, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 4 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-1341 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Raul is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 26, 2012.

Overview of Raul Silva

Age: 58

Gender: male

Birth year: 1964

Lives in: Waterford

Raul Silva's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 26, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Quaker Hill School

Voter ID: 004251555

Congressional District: 002

House District: 038

Senate District: 020

Raul Silva Adress & Maps

Residential Address

4 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-1341

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Raul Silva

1 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-1341
No known party affiliation
1 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-1341
No known party affiliation
3 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-0000
No known party affiliation
3 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-0000
No known party affiliation
3 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-0000
No known party affiliation
3 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-0000
No known party affiliation
4 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-1341
No known party affiliation
5 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-1341
No known party affiliation
5 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-0000
No known party affiliation
6 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-1341
No known party affiliation
6 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-1341
No known party affiliation
6 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-1341
No known party affiliation
7 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-0000
No known party affiliation
7 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-1341
No known party affiliation
7 Rainbow Court, Waterford , 06375-1341
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $69,998

Net Worth: $740,289

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.