Briana Nash

Female, Age 31 Wallingford, Connecticut

Briana Nash is a 31 years old female, born on Thursday, 6th of February 1992. She will turn 32 on February 06, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 68 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3610 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Briana is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 10, 2016.

Overview of Briana Nash

Age: 31

Gender: female

Birth year: 1992

Lives in: Wallingford

Briana Nash's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 10, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Evarts C. Stevens School

Voter ID: 004079629

Congressional District: 003

House District: 085

Senate District: 034

Briana Nash Adress & Maps

Residential Address

68 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3610

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Briana Nash

52 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3610
No known party affiliation
52 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3610
No known party affiliation
52 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3610
No known party affiliation
54 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3610
No known party affiliation
60 Lee Avenue Fl2, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3610
No known party affiliation
64 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3610
No known party affiliation
64 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3610
No known party affiliation
68 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3610
No known party affiliation
69 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3637
No known party affiliation
72 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3610
No known party affiliation
73 Lee Avenue 2, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3637
No known party affiliation
73 Lee Avenue, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3637
No known party affiliation
77 Lee Avenue 2, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3637
No known party affiliation
77 Lee Avenue 1, Wallingford, Ct 06492-3637
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $76,925

Net Worth: $457,120

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.