Jacqueline S Krac De Mendive

Female, Age 52 Greenwich , Connecticut

Jacqueline S Krac De Mendive is a 52 years old female, born on Sunday, 29th of November 1970. She will turn 53 on November 29, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 21 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701 and is not affiliated with any political party. Jacqueline is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 14, 2009.

Overview of Jacqueline S Krac De Mendive

Age: 52

Gender: female

Birth year: 1971

Lives in: Greenwich

Phone number 203-637-1349

Jacqueline S Krac De Mendive's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 14, 2009

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 005

Polling place: Riverside School 5a

Voter ID: 004043168

Congressional District: 004

House District: 151

Senate District: 036

Jacqueline S Krac De Mendive Adress & Maps

Residential Address

21 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jacqueline S Krac De Mendive

19 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation
19 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation
19 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation
19 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation
19 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation
20 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation
20 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation
21 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation
21 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation
21 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation
23 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation
23 Dialstone Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1701
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $102,259

Net Worth: $212,172

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.