Jamie A Sherry

Female, Age 38 Seymour, Connecticut

Jamie A Sherry is a 38 years old female, born on Monday, 16th of July 1984. She will turn 39 on July 16, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 35 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3033 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jamie is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 3, 2012.

Overview of Jamie A Sherry

Age: 38

Gender: female

Birth year: 1984

Lives in: Seymour

Jamie A Sherry's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 3, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: District 3 Chatfieldlopresti School

Voter ID: 003993005

Congressional District: 003

House District: 105

Senate District: 032

Jamie A Sherry Adress & Maps

Residential Address

35 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3033

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jamie A Sherry

31 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3033
No known party affiliation
31 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3033
No known party affiliation
32 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3013
No known party affiliation
32 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3013
No known party affiliation
33 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3033
No known party affiliation
33 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3033
No known party affiliation
33 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3033
No known party affiliation
35 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3033
No known party affiliation
35 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3033
No known party affiliation
36 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3013
No known party affiliation
42 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3031
No known party affiliation
42 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3031
No known party affiliation
42 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3031
No known party affiliation
43 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3032
No known party affiliation
44 Jupiter Drive, Seymour, 06483-3031
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $46,092

Net Worth: $1,590,872

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.