Margaret Louise Leiss

Female, Age 54 Madison, Connecticut

Margaret Louise Leiss is a 54 years old female, born on Tuesday, 8th of October 1968. She will turn 55 on October 08, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 108 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-3316 and is not affiliated with any political party. Margaret is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 19, 2010. Our records show Fredric M Leiss (60) as possible relative.

Overview of Margaret Louise Leiss

Age: 54

Gender: female

Birth year: 1969

Lives in: Madison

Phone number 203-464-0143

Margaret Louise Leiss's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 19, 2010

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: District 1 South

Voter ID: 003937463

Congressional District: 002

House District: 101

Senate District: 012

Margaret Louise Leiss Adress & Maps

Residential Address

108 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-3316

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Margaret Louise Leiss

61 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-3317
No known party affiliation
63 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-3357
No known party affiliation
69 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-3357
No known party affiliation
88 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-3376
No known party affiliation
88 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-3376
No known party affiliation
104 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-3316
No known party affiliation
104 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-0644
No known party affiliation
108 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-3316
No known party affiliation
108 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-3316
No known party affiliation
108 Lovers Lane, Madison, Ct 06443-3316
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Margaret Louise Leiss's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Madison, Ct
Born on: Thursday, 14th of March 1963
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $76,296

Net Worth: $692,571

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.