Danielle Roper

Female, Age 54 Bridgeport, Connecticut

Danielle Roper is a 54 years old female, born on Tuesday, 26th of August 1969. She will turn 55 on August 26, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 74 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Danielle is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 25, 2008.

Overview of Danielle Roper

Age: 54

Gender: female

Birth year: 1970

Lives in: Bridgeport

Danielle Roper's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 25, 2008

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 124

Polling place: John F Kennedy Campus

Voter ID: 003825188

Congressional District: 004

House District: 124

Senate District: 023

Danielle Roper Adress & Maps

Residential Address

74 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Danielle Roper

66 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945
No known party affiliation
68 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945
No known party affiliation
68 Coggswell Street 2, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945
No known party affiliation
70 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945
No known party affiliation
72 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945
No known party affiliation
72 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945
No known party affiliation
72 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945
No known party affiliation
76 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945
No known party affiliation
80 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945
No known party affiliation
80 Coggswell Street 1, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1945
No known party affiliation
90 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1914
No known party affiliation
92 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1914
No known party affiliation
92 Coggswell Street, Bridgeport, Ct 06610-1914
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $94,010

Net Worth: $452,822

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.