Martin J Daigle

Male, Age 65 Farmington , Connecticut

Martin J Daigle is a 65 years old male, born on Sunday, 27th of October 1957. He will turn 66 on October 27, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 24 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154 and is not affiliated with any political party. Martin is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 18, 2004.

Overview of Martin J Daigle

Age: 65

Gender: male

Birth year: 1958

Lives in: Farmington

Martin J Daigle's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 18, 2004

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 06

District: 002

Polling place: Community Center District 2 Precinct 6

Voter ID: 003549762

Congressional District: 005

House District: 021

Senate District: 005

Martin J Daigle Adress & Maps

Residential Address

24 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Martin J Daigle

21 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2155
No known party affiliation
22 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154
No known party affiliation
22 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154
No known party affiliation
22 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154
No known party affiliation
22 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154
No known party affiliation
22 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154
No known party affiliation
22 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154
No known party affiliation
24 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154
No known party affiliation
26 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154
No known party affiliation
26 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154
No known party affiliation
26 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2154
No known party affiliation
27 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2155
No known party affiliation
27 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2155
No known party affiliation
27 Kent Lane, Farmington , Ct 06032-2155
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $111,913

Net Worth: $1,299,762

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.