Kathleen Rosalina Maiolo

Female, Age 52 New Milford, Connecticut

Kathleen Rosalina Maiolo is a 52 years old female, born on Tuesday, 5th of October 1971. She will turn 53 on October 05, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 5 Brushy Hill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3069 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Kathleen is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 17, 2000. Our records show Christopher Ralph Maiolo (58) as possible relative.

Overview of Kathleen Rosalina Maiolo

Age: 52

Gender: female

Birth year: 1971

Lives in: New Milford

Phone number 860-488-5183

Kathleen Rosalina Maiolo's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 17, 2000

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Northville School

Voter ID: 003130645

Congressional District: 005

House District: 067

Senate District: 030

Kathleen Rosalina Maiolo Adress & Maps

Residential Address

5 Brushy Hill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3069

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Kathleen Rosalina Maiolo

1 Brushy Hill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3069
No known party affiliation
1 Brushy Hill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3069
No known party affiliation
7 Brushy Hill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3069
No known party affiliation
7 Brushy Hill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3069
No known party affiliation
11 Brushy Hill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3069
No known party affiliation
11 Brushy Hill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3069
No known party affiliation
15 Brushy Hill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3069
No known party affiliation
15 Brushy Hill Lane, New Milford, Ct 06776-3069
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Kathleen Rosalina Maiolo's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

New Milford, Ct
Born on: Monday, 18th of January 1965
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $97,643

Net Worth: $1,368,262

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.