Daimar Ramos

Female, Age 50 Glastonbury, Connecticut

Daimar Ramos is a 50 years old female, born on Monday, 30th of July 1973. She will turn 51 on July 30, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 21 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-0000 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Daimar is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 19, 1998.

Overview of Daimar Ramos

Age: 50

Gender: female

Birth year: 1974

Lives in: Glastonbury

Phone number 860-657-2390

Daimar Ramos's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 19, 1998

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: District 5 Nayaug Elementary School

Voter ID: 001793209

Congressional District: 001

House District: 031

Senate District: 004

Daimar Ramos Adress & Maps

Residential Address

21 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-0000

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Daimar Ramos

12 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-3212
No known party affiliation
12 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-3212
No known party affiliation
21 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-3213
No known party affiliation
48 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-3212
No known party affiliation
55 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-3213
No known party affiliation
55 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-3213
No known party affiliation
56 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073
No known party affiliation
62 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-3212
No known party affiliation
62 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-3212
No known party affiliation
62 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-3212
No known party affiliation
68 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-0000
No known party affiliation
84 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-0000
No known party affiliation
84 Hickory Drive, Glastonbury, Ct 06073-3212
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $114,555

Net Worth: $575,010

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.