Elayne Pons

Female, Age 58 Ledyard, Connecticut

Elayne Pons is a 58 years old female, born on Sunday, 14th of February 1965. She will turn 59 on February 14, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 57 Harvard Terrace, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1414 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Elayne is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 4, 1996. Our records show Emma Rose Pons (24) and David William Pons (21) as possible relatives.

Overview of Elayne Pons

Age: 58

Gender: female

Birth year: 1965

Lives in: Ledyard

Phone number 860-464-2670

Elayne Pons's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 4, 1996

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Juliet Long School

Voter ID: 001204483

Congressional District: 002

House District: 040

Senate District: 019

Elayne Pons Adress & Maps

Residential Address

57 Harvard Terrace, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1414

Mailing Address

57 Harvard Terrace, Gales Ferry, Ct 063351414

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Elayne Pons

53 Harvard Terrace, Ledyard, Ct 06335-0000
No known party affiliation
55 Harvard Terrace, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1414
No known party affiliation
55 Harvard Terrace, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1414
No known party affiliation
55 Harvard Terrace, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1414
No known party affiliation
56 Harvard Terrace, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1415
No known party affiliation
56 Harvard Terrace, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1415
No known party affiliation
56 Harvard Terrace, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1415
No known party affiliation
58 Harvard Terrace, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1415
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Elayne Pons's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Ledyard, Ct
Born on: Saturday, 10th of April 1999
Gender: Female
Ledyard, Ct
Born on: Monday, 20th of May 2002
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $48,635

Net Worth: $676,127

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.