Ruth Haddad

Female, Age 100 Windham, Connecticut

Ruth Haddad is a 100 years old female, born on Wednesday, 11th of October 1922. She will turn 101 on October 11, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 309 North Street, Windham, 06226-1642 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Ruth is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 1, 1800.

Overview of Ruth Haddad

Age: 100

Gender: female

Birth year: 1922

Lives in: Windham

Phone number 860-423-5948

Ruth Haddad's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 1, 1800

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 006

Polling place: Bpo Elks 1311

Voter ID: 000900089

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Ruth Haddad Adress & Maps

Residential Address

309 North Street, Windham, 06226-1642

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Ruth Haddad

304 North Street, Windham, 06226-1641
No known party affiliation
304 North Street, Windham, 06226-1641
No known party affiliation
304 North Street, Windham, 06226-1641
No known party affiliation
304 North Street, Windham, 06226-1641
No known party affiliation
305 North Street, Windham, 06226-1642
No known party affiliation
305 North Street, Windham, 06226-1642
No known party affiliation
306 North Street, Windham, 06226-1641
No known party affiliation
311 North Street, Windham, 06226-1642
No known party affiliation
316 North Street, Windham, 06226-1641
No known party affiliation
344 North Street, Windham, 06226-1641
No known party affiliation
344 North Street, Windham, 06226-1641
No known party affiliation
344 North Street, Windham, 06226-1641
No known party affiliation
349 North Street, Windham, 06226-1642
No known party affiliation
349 North Street A, Windham, 06226-1642
No known party affiliation
349 North Street, Windham, 06226-1642
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $75,492

Net Worth: $1,406,031

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.