Sylivo Borracci

Male, Age 92 Windsor Locks, Connecticut

Sylivo Borracci is a 92 years old male, born on Wednesday, 4th of March 1931. He will turn 93 on March 04, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 18 James Street, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-1821 and is not affiliated with any political party. Sylivo is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 1, 1990. Our records show Annteresa Borracci (91) and Joseph A Borracci (63) as possible relatives.

Overview of Sylivo Borracci

Age: 92

Gender: male

Birth year: 1932

Lives in: Windsor Locks

Phone number 860-623-5712

Sylivo Borracci's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 1, 1990

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Mario Gatti Town Hall

Voter ID: 000791788

Congressional District: 001

House District: 060

Senate District: 007

Sylivo Borracci Adress & Maps

Residential Address

18 James Street, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-1821

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Sylivo Borracci

13 James Street, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-1820
No known party affiliation
14 James Street, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-1821
No known party affiliation
14 James Street, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-1821
No known party affiliation
15 James Street, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-1820
No known party affiliation
15 James Street, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-1820
No known party affiliation
16 James Street, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-1821
No known party affiliation
16 James Street, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-1821
No known party affiliation
22 James Street, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-1821
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Sylivo Borracci's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Windsor Locks, Ct
Born on: Tuesday, 21st of June 1932
Gender: Female
Windsor Locks, Ct
Born on: Thursday, 21st of July 1960
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $78,477

Net Worth: $92,784

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.