Gina L Driscoll

Female, Age 51 Burlington, Connecticut

Gina L Driscoll is a 51 years old female, born on Saturday, 13th of March 1971. She will turn 52 on March 13, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 5 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1501 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Gina is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 7, 2017.

Overview of Gina L Driscoll

Age: 51

Gender: female

Birth year: 1971

Lives in: Burlington

Gina L Driscoll's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 7, 2017

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Town Hall

Voter ID: 000664430

Congressional District: 005

House District: 076

Senate District: 005

Gina L Driscoll Adress & Maps

Residential Address

5 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1501

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Gina L Driscoll

3 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1501
No known party affiliation
3 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1501
No known party affiliation
4 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1531
No known party affiliation
4 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1531
No known party affiliation
4 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1531
No known party affiliation
5 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1501
No known party affiliation
7 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1501
No known party affiliation
9 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1501
No known party affiliation
9 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1501
No known party affiliation
13 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1501
No known party affiliation
13 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1501
No known party affiliation
16 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1531
No known party affiliation
20 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1531
No known party affiliation
20 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1531
No known party affiliation
30 Barnes Hill, Burlington, 06013-1531
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $71,919

Net Worth: $116,653

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.