Edmund J Rudnick Iii

Male, Age 49 Torrington , Connecticut

Edmund J Rudnick Iii is a 49 years old male, born on Saturday, 19th of January 1974. He will turn 50 on January 19, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 482 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6310 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Edmund is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 1, 1992.

Overview of Edmund J Rudnick Iii

Age: 49

Gender: male

Birth year: 1974

Lives in: Torrington

Phone number 860-496-7057

Edmund J Rudnick Iii's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 1, 1992

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 008

Polling place: Armory

Voter ID: 000451958

Congressional District: 005

House District: 065

Senate District: 008

Edmund J Rudnick Iii Adress & Maps

Residential Address

482 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6310

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Edmund J Rudnick Iii

450 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6307
No known party affiliation
458 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6307
No known party affiliation
458 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6307
No known party affiliation
466 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6307
No known party affiliation
466 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6307
No known party affiliation
466 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6307
No known party affiliation
476 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6310
No known party affiliation
482 High Street 1, Torrington , Ct 06790-6310
No known party affiliation
482 High Street 1, Torrington , Ct 06790-6310
No known party affiliation
482 High Street 1, Torrington , Ct 06790-6310
No known party affiliation
488 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6310
No known party affiliation
490 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6310
No known party affiliation
490 High Street, Torrington , Ct 06790-6310
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $70,111

Net Worth: $100,821

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.